ScreenshotAPI vs Microlink: Screenshot API Comparison
Compare ScreenshotAPI with Microlink for website screenshots. Features, pricing models, performance, and which API fits your use case better.
Last updated: 2026-03-25
Try ScreenshotAPI free
5 free credits. No credit card required.
Microlink is a headless browser API that does more than screenshots. It extracts metadata, generates link previews, creates PDFs, and runs Lighthouse audits alongside its screenshot capabilities. ScreenshotAPI is a focused screenshot endpoint. If you are evaluating Microlink vs ScreenshotAPI, this comparison covers what matters for screenshot-specific workflows: features, pricing, performance, and developer experience.
Product Scope Comparison
| Aspect | ScreenshotAPI | Microlink |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Screenshot capture | Link data extraction platform |
| Screenshots | Core product | One of many features |
| Metadata extraction | ✗ | ✓ |
| PDF generation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Lighthouse audits | ✗ | ✓ |
| Favicon extraction | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open Graph data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Technology detection | ✗ | ✓ |
Microlink is a broader platform. ScreenshotAPI does one thing.
Screenshot Feature Comparison
| Feature | ScreenshotAPI | Microlink |
|---|---|---|
| PNG output | ✓ | ✓ |
| JPEG output | ✓ | ✓ |
| WebP output | ✓ | ✗ |
| Full-page capture | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom viewport | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dark mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wait for network idle | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wait for CSS selector | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom delay | ✓ | ✓ |
| Device emulation | ✗ | ✓ |
| CSS injection | ✗ | ✓ |
| JavaScript execution | ✗ | ✓ |
| Click before capture | ✗ | ✓ |
| Scroll to element | ✗ | ✓ |
| CDN caching | ✗ | ✓ (240+ edges) |
| Element hiding | ✗ | ✓ (adblock) |
Microlink offers more screenshot customization options, including browser automation features like clicking elements, scrolling, and injecting CSS/JavaScript. ScreenshotAPI provides a simpler API surface with WebP output that Microlink lacks.
Code Comparison
ScreenshotAPI
gopackage main import ( "fmt" "io" "net/http" "os" ) func main() { req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", "https://screenshotapi.to/api/v1/screenshot?url=https://example.com&width=1440&height=900&type=png", nil) req.Header.Set("x-api-key", "sk_live_xxxxx") resp, _ := http.DefaultClient.Do(req) defer resp.Body.Close() file, _ := os.Create("screenshot.png") defer file.Close() io.Copy(file, resp.Body) fmt.Println("Screenshot saved") }
Microlink
gopackage main import ( "fmt" "io" "net/http" "os" ) func main() { resp, _ := http.Get( "https://api.microlink.io?url=https://example.com&screenshot=true&viewport.width=1440&viewport.height=900") defer resp.Body.Close() file, _ := os.Create("screenshot.png") defer file.Close() io.Copy(file, resp.Body) fmt.Println("Screenshot saved") }
Microlink's screenshot API returns JSON by default, with the screenshot as a URL in the response. To get the image directly, you need to follow the URL from the JSON response. ScreenshotAPI returns the image bytes directly, which is simpler for most use cases. Check the Go screenshot guide for more implementation details.
Pricing Comparison
ScreenshotAPI
| Plan | Credits | Price | Per Credit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 5 | $0 | Free |
| Starter | 500 | $20 | $0.040 |
| Growth | 2,000 | $60 | $0.030 |
| Pro | 10,000 | $200 | $0.020 |
| Scale | 50,000 | $750 | $0.015 |
No subscription. Credits never expire.
Microlink
| Plan | Requests/month | Price/month | Per Request |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 50 | $0 | Free |
| Pro (46K) | 46,000 | ~$30 | ~$0.00065 |
| Pro (140K) | 140,000 | ~$80 | ~$0.00057 |
| Enterprise | Custom | $500+ | Custom |
Monthly subscription. Unused requests do not roll over.
Pricing Analysis
Microlink is dramatically cheaper per request at scale. If you are making tens of thousands of requests monthly, Microlink's subscription pricing delivers far more value per dollar.
ScreenshotAPI is simpler for low or variable volume. No monthly commitment, no expiring credits. At under 2,000 screenshots/month, ScreenshotAPI's pay-as-you-go model avoids subscription overhead. For details, see the pricing page.
Microlink's pricing includes all features. Every Microlink request can extract metadata, generate screenshots, and run audits. If you use multiple Microlink features per URL, the effective cost per screenshot drops further.
Performance and Caching
Microlink has invested heavily in performance, with a global CDN across 240+ Cloudflare edge locations. For cached content, Microlink serves responses extremely quickly. Their published benchmarks show average cold-start latency around 4 seconds.
ScreenshotAPI focuses on fresh captures. Every request generates a new screenshot, which ensures accuracy for dynamic content but may be slower than Microlink's cached responses for static sites.
If your use case can tolerate cached screenshots (content that does not change frequently), Microlink's CDN architecture delivers faster apparent response times. If you need fresh captures every time (monitoring, dynamic content, user-triggered screenshots), the caching difference matters less.
Where Microlink Wins
Broader data extraction. If you need metadata, favicons, Open Graph data, or Lighthouse scores alongside screenshots, Microlink provides all of this from a single API.
Lower per-request cost at scale. For high-volume usage (tens of thousands of requests monthly), Microlink's subscription pricing is significantly cheaper per request.
Advanced browser control. CSS injection, JavaScript execution, click automation, and scroll control give you more customization options for screenshot capture.
CDN performance. The 240+ edge caching layer delivers fast responses for frequently requested URLs.
Device emulation. Built-in device presets for mobile and tablet screenshots.
Where ScreenshotAPI Wins
Simpler API. Fewer parameters, direct image response, focused documentation. Less to learn, fewer things to misconfigure.
WebP output. Smaller image files for link previews and directory thumbnails where bandwidth matters.
No subscription. Pay-as-you-go credits that never expire. Better for variable workloads and projects in early stages.
Direct image response. ScreenshotAPI returns image bytes directly. Microlink returns JSON with a screenshot URL that requires an additional fetch.
Header-based authentication. More secure than URL-based authentication.
Use Case Recommendations
Link previews with metadata
Microlink. If you need both a screenshot and Open Graph data for link preview cards, Microlink provides both in one call. See also the link previews use case.
Simple URL-to-image capture
ScreenshotAPI. For straightforward screenshot capture without metadata extraction, ScreenshotAPI's simpler API and direct response is faster to implement.
High-volume batch processing
Microlink. The per-request cost advantage at scale makes Microlink the economical choice for processing large URL lists.
Variable or low-volume usage
ScreenshotAPI. No monthly commitment means no wasted spend during quiet periods.
OG image generation
ScreenshotAPI. Direct image response simplifies OG image generation workflows where you need the image bytes immediately.
Verdict
Choose Microlink if you need a comprehensive link data platform that handles screenshots alongside metadata extraction, PDF generation, and performance audits. Its per-request pricing at scale is unbeatable.
Choose ScreenshotAPI if you want a focused screenshot API with simple pricing, direct image responses, and WebP output. It is the right tool when screenshots are your only requirement and you prefer pay-as-you-go over subscriptions.
Ready to switch? See the Microlink migration guide for parameter mapping and code examples. For a broader market overview, see the best screenshot API comparison.
Frequently asked questions
What is Microlink?
Microlink is a headless browser API that extracts metadata, generates screenshots, creates PDFs, and provides link preview data from URLs. Screenshots are one feature of a broader data extraction platform.
Is ScreenshotAPI cheaper than Microlink?
For low volumes, yes. ScreenshotAPI starts at $20 for 500 credits. Microlink's free tier offers 50 requests/month, but paid plans start higher and are geared toward high-volume usage with monthly subscriptions.
Does Microlink support WebP screenshots?
Microlink supports PNG and JPEG output formats. ScreenshotAPI adds WebP support for smaller file sizes.
Which has better performance?
Microlink has invested heavily in CDN-based caching with 240+ edge locations, which delivers fast response times for cached content. ScreenshotAPI focuses on fresh captures without aggressive caching.
Related resources
Start capturing screenshots today
Create a free account and get 5 credits to try the API. No credit card required. Pay only for what you use.