5 Best Browserless Alternatives for Screenshots in 2026

The best Browserless alternatives for screenshots, including free tiers — and how Browserless's unit-based pricing compares to one-request screenshot APIs.

Last updated: 2026-07-04

Try ScreenshotAPI free

200 free screenshots/month. No credit card required.

Start for free

The best Browserless alternatives for screenshots are ScreenshotAPI (simplest), Urlbox (most features), Microlink (best value at scale), ApiFlash (cheapest), and ScrapingBee (best for bot-protected sites). Unlike Browserless — which requires Puppeteer or Playwright code over a WebSocket connection — each returns a finished screenshot from a single HTTP request. Browserless does offer a free tier (1,000 units per month, no credit card), but a "unit" is up to 30 seconds of browser time, so for screenshot-only workloads a dedicated per-capture API is usually simpler and cheaper.

Browserless is a powerful hosted browser platform, but it is designed for general browser automation, not specifically for screenshots. If you are using Browserless primarily to capture website screenshots, you are writing and maintaining Puppeteer or Playwright code for a task that dedicated screenshot APIs handle with a single HTTP request. These Browserless alternatives for screenshot capture are simpler, often cheaper, and purpose-built for the job.

Why Switch from Browserless for Screenshots

Browserless requires you to:

  1. Connect via WebSocket to a remote browser
  2. Write Puppeteer or Playwright code to navigate, wait, and capture
  3. Handle connection lifecycle (connect, error, disconnect)
  4. Manage browser session cleanup
  5. Pay for browser session time regardless of how long your screenshot takes

Dedicated screenshot APIs reduce this to:

  1. Make an HTTP GET request with URL and options
  2. Receive screenshot bytes

The difference in code complexity is substantial:

Browserless approach

javascript
const puppeteer = require('puppeteer'); const browser = await puppeteer.connect({ browserWSEndpoint: 'wss://chrome.browserless.io?token=YOUR_TOKEN' }); try { const page = await browser.newPage(); await page.setViewport({ width: 1440, height: 900 }); await page.goto('https://example.com', { waitUntil: 'networkidle0' }); const screenshot = await page.screenshot({ type: 'png' }); return screenshot; } finally { await browser.close(); }

Screenshot API approach

javascript
const response = await fetch( 'https://screenshotapi.to/api/v1/screenshot?url=https://example.com&width=1440&height=900&type=png', { headers: { 'x-api-key': 'sk_live_xxxxx' } } ); const screenshot = await response.arrayBuffer();

Alternatives at a Glance

FeatureScreenshotAPIUrlboxMicrolinkApiFlashScrapingBee
InterfaceREST APIREST APIREST APIREST APIREST API
Code required1 HTTP call1 HTTP call1 HTTP call1 HTTP call1 HTTP call
WebP output
Dark mode
Full-page capture
PDF generation
Browser automationLimited
Proxy rotation
Starting price$9/mo$19/moFree (50/mo)$7/mo$49/mo

Does Browserless Have a Free Tier?

Yes. Browserless offers a free plan with 1,000 units per month and 2 concurrent browsers, with no credit card required (verified on browserless.io/pricing, July 2026). A "unit" is a block of up to 30 seconds of browser time per connection, so a single fast screenshot typically costs one unit — but a slow-loading page, a proxy request, or a captcha solve consumes more. Paid plans start at Prototyping ($25/month, billed annually), then Starter ($140/month) and Scale ($350/month).

There is no public shared "demo token" anymore. Despite older tutorials that reference one, you sign up for the free plan and use your own API token. And the free tier still requires you to write and maintain Puppeteer or Playwright code against a WebSocket endpoint — it does not turn Browserless into a one-request screenshot API.

If you want a free screenshot tier without writing browser code, the dedicated alternatives compare like this:

ServiceFree tierScreenshot code
Browserless1,000 units/mo (no card)Puppeteer/Playwright over WebSocket
ScreenshotAPI200 screenshots/mo1 HTTP request
ApiFlash100 screenshots/mo1 HTTP request
Microlink50 requests/mo1 HTTP request
UrlboxPaid only (from $19/mo)1 HTTP request
ScrapingBeePaid only (from $49/mo)1 HTTP request

Browserless's free unit allowance is generous, but every capture still runs through your own browser-automation code. The dedicated APIs trade a smaller free quota for a single HTTP call and zero session management — the right trade when screenshots are all you need.

1. ScreenshotAPI

Best for: Simple, focused screenshot capture without browser code

ScreenshotAPI is the most direct Browserless alternative for screenshot-only workloads. One GET request returns an image, with no browser sessions to manage.

Why switch from Browserless:

  • Zero browser code to write or maintain
  • Pay per screenshot, not per browser session
  • Works from any HTTP-capable environment (serverless, edge, lightweight containers)
  • WebP output and dark mode capture
  • No Puppeteer or Playwright dependencies
PlanMonthly priceScreenshots/monthPer screenshot
Starter$19/mo5,000$0.0038
Growth$49/mo25,000$0.0020
Scale$149/mo100,000$0.0015

200 free screenshots per month — no credit card required. Credit packs are also available for one-time purchases:

PackCreditsPricePer screenshot
Starter1,000$9$0.0090
Growth5,000$29$0.0058
Pro25,000$99$0.0040
Scale100,000$299$0.0030

For a direct comparison, see ScreenshotAPI vs Browserless.

2. Urlbox

Best for: Feature-rich screenshot API with enterprise capabilities

Urlbox is the most feature-complete screenshot API. It matches Browserless's rendering quality while providing a much simpler interface for screenshot capture.

Why switch from Browserless:

  • REST API instead of WebSocket
  • Signed URLs for client-side rendering (no backend proxy needed)
  • Built-in ad and cookie blocking
  • AVIF, SVG, video, and PDF output
  • Stealth mode for difficult-to-capture sites

Limitations:

  • No full browser automation (cannot replace Browserless for non-screenshot tasks)
  • Higher pricing than simpler alternatives

Pricing: Plans from $19/month (2,000 renders) to $498+/month. See ScreenshotAPI vs Urlbox.

3. Microlink

Best for: High-volume screenshot and data extraction

Microlink combines screenshot capture with metadata extraction, making it ideal for teams that currently use Browserless for both scraping and screenshots.

Why switch from Browserless:

  • REST API with CDN caching across 240+ edges
  • Metadata extraction alongside screenshots
  • Lower per-request cost at high volumes
  • No browser code required
  • Built-in Lighthouse audits

Limitations:

  • Returns JSON by default (extra step to get image bytes)
  • Less control than raw browser access
  • Monthly subscription model

Pricing: 50 free requests/month. Pro plans from ~$30/month. See ScreenshotAPI vs Microlink.

4. ApiFlash

Best for: Budget-friendly screenshot capture

ApiFlash offers the lowest starting price for a quality screenshot API, making it an attractive Browserless alternative for cost-conscious teams.

Why switch from Browserless:

  • Simple REST API, no browser code
  • Built-in ad and cookie banner blocking
  • CSS and JavaScript injection
  • Fraction of the cost for screenshot workloads

Limitations:

  • No WebP or dark mode support
  • API key in URL
  • Limited wait strategies

Pricing: 100 free screenshots/month. Plans from $7/month. See ScreenshotAPI vs ApiFlash.

5. ScrapingBee

Best for: Screenshots of sites that block automated access

ScrapingBee combines screenshot capture with residential proxy rotation, making it the best alternative for teams using Browserless to capture sites that detect and block headless browsers.

Why switch from Browserless:

  • Residential proxies bypass bot detection more effectively
  • REST API instead of WebSocket browser sessions
  • Combined scraping and screenshot capabilities
  • No browser code to maintain

Limitations:

  • Higher pricing ($49+/month)
  • Screenshot features are secondary to scraping
  • No WebP or dark mode support

Pricing: Plans from $49/month. See ScreenshotAPI vs ScrapingBee.

When to Keep Browserless

These alternatives replace Browserless for screenshot capture. They do not replace Browserless for:

  • Full browser automation: Multi-step flows, form filling, navigation sequences
  • Web scraping (except ScrapingBee) that requires complex page interaction
  • Testing infrastructure: Running Puppeteer or Playwright test suites remotely
  • Custom browser extensions: Loading Chrome extensions in remote browsers
  • Session management: Maintaining authenticated browser sessions across multiple operations

If screenshots are just one small part of a larger browser automation workflow, Browserless's unified platform may still make sense.

Cost Comparison for Screenshot Workloads

At 10,000 screenshots per month:

ServiceEstimated Monthly CostNotes
ScreenshotAPI$99/monthPro plan (25,000/mo)
Urlbox$99/monthUltra plan
Microlink~$30/monthPro plan
ApiFlash$42/monthPro plan
ScrapingBee$99/monthStartup plan
Browserless$100-200+/monthSession-time based, varies

For screenshot-specific workloads, every dedicated API is more cost-predictable than Browserless's session-time pricing.

Migration from Browserless

Replacing Browserless screenshot code with a REST API call is straightforward. See the Puppeteer screenshot alternatives guide for examples of converting Puppeteer code to API calls, or check the JavaScript guide for implementation details.

Verdict

If you use Browserless primarily for screenshots, switching to a dedicated screenshot API simplifies your code, reduces costs, and eliminates the need to maintain browser automation scripts.

ScreenshotAPI is the simplest alternative with flexible pricing. Urlbox is the most feature-rich. Microlink offers the best value at scale. ApiFlash is the cheapest. ScrapingBee handles sites that block headless browsers.

See the best screenshot API comparison for a complete market overview.

Frequently asked questions

Is Browserless overkill for screenshots?

If you only need screenshots, yes. Browserless provides full headless browser access via WebSocket, requiring Puppeteer or Playwright code. Dedicated screenshot APIs return images from a single HTTP request without any browser code.

What is the simplest alternative to Browserless for screenshots?

ScreenshotAPI offers the simplest approach: one GET request returns a screenshot. No WebSocket connections, no browser code, no client libraries.

Are Browserless alternatives cheaper?

For screenshot-only workloads, yes. Browserless charges for browser session time. Dedicated screenshot APIs charge per capture, which is more predictable and typically cheaper for screenshot-specific use cases.

When should I stick with Browserless?

Keep Browserless if you need full browser automation: multi-step flows, form filling, scraping, testing, or any workflow that requires programmatic browser control beyond simple URL-to-image capture.

Does Browserless have a free tier or demo token?

Browserless offers a free plan with 1,000 units per month and 2 concurrent browsers, with no credit card required (a unit is up to 30 seconds of browser time per connection). There is no public shared demo token — you sign up and use your own API token. The free tier still requires Puppeteer or Playwright code over a WebSocket, so for screenshot-only work a dedicated API like ScreenshotAPI (200 free screenshots per month) is simpler.

Related resources

Start capturing screenshots today

Create a free account and get 200 free screenshots per month to try the API. No credit card required.